To: Editors, News DirectorsDate: February 16, 2006
For: Immediate Release 

ACC Approves Energy Saving Programs

Programs Designed to Reduce Demand for Energy at Customer Site

PHOENIX – In a 4-1 vote, the Commission this week approved six new programs representing almost $21 million in funding for non-residential energy efficiency programs.  The funding includes financial incentives and assistance to customers in order to encourage energy-efficient building design and retrofit.  Non-residential programs address commercial, industrial, small business and school facilities and include measures for new construction as well as for retrofitting existing structures.

Demand side management (DSM) programs reduce demand on the customer side of the meter through energy efficient construction or by replacing high energy use products with newer, more efficient models.

Last year, the Arizona Corporation Commission mandated that Arizona Public Service (APS) dedicate $48 million to specific programs designed to reduce the demand for energy.  The 2005 ruling (Decision 67744) required an increase in the money APS devotes to energy-efficiency DSM programs.

Residential programs are under review and consideration by Commission staff and will be brought to the Commissioners for approval in the future.

In evaluating the merits of each program, the Commission looked at a cost-benefit analysis that seeks to estimate the net societal benefits of such programs.  The analysis weighs the incremental benefits to society against the incremental cost of having the program in place.  Societal costs include the customer’s cost of installing the more energy-efficient measures and APS’ costs for delivering the program, excluding incentives.  Societal benefits also include the deferred generation capacity costs and avoided energy costs.  Other benefits of energy efficiency programs include reduced water consumption and reduced air pollution, although dollar values were not assigned to those benefits.

The approved programs include:

 

Schools – $1,680,000 budget.  APS estimates that there are 1,400 public school sites in its service area and estimates that 40 percent of electricity usage at schools is for lighting.  APS estimated that 60 percent of lighting at schools could be upgraded for energy efficiency.  Capped at $15/student per year or $25,000 per school district per year, whichever is less.

 

  • Net Societal Benefits – $816,000; could reduce annual peak demand by 637 kilowatts (kW) and energy consumption of 178,000 megawatt hours (MWh) over the life of the measures.

 

Non-Residential Existing Facilities – $6,760,075 budget.  Available for large offices, large retail centers, groceries, resorts, hotels, colleges and universities and in-patient healthcare centers having a monthly peak demand in excess of 200 kW.

 

  • Net Societal Benefits – $15 million; could reduce annual peak demand by 10 MW and energy consumption of 856,000 MWh over the life of the measures.

 

Non-Residential New Construction and Major Renovation – $7,360,075 budget.  Available for facilities with an estimated monthly peak demand greater than 200 kW, including large offices, retail centers, groceries, resorts or hotels, colleges and universities and in-patient healthcare centers. 

 

  • Net Societal Benefits – $13.8 million; could reduce annual peak demand by 8.8 MW and energy consumption of 729,000 MWh over the life of the measures.

 

Small Non-Residential – $4,359,851 budget.  Available for non-residential facilities with monthly peak demand below 200 kW, including restaurants, primary and secondary schools, small offices, small retail centers, hotels, and outpatient healthcare centers.

 

  • Net Societal Benefits – $9.8 million; could reduce annual peak demand by 6.5 MW and energy consumption of 571,000 MWh over the life of the measures.

 

Non-Residential Builder Operator Training – $240,000 budget.  APS will offer specialized energy management training for building operators, managers and facility maintenance technicians.

 

  • Net Societal Benefits – $1 million; could reduce annual peak demand by 643 kW and energy consumption of 81,000 MWh over the life of the measures.

 

Non-Residential Energy Information Services – $300,000 budget.  This program would provide customers with a web-based energy information tool that provides facility managers and operators feedback on energy consumption and load profiles within their facilities.  Access to this information would allow personnel to make more informed decisions about energy use at their facilities.

 

  • Net Societal Benefits – $878,000; could reduce annual peak demand by 357 kW and energy consumption of 45,000 MWh over the economic life of the measures.

 

The measures are classified as either prescriptive or custom efficiency.  Prescriptive measures include the installation of efficient lighting fixtures; high-efficiency heating, ventilating and air conditioning systems; high-efficiency motors, and building envelope measures such as cool roofs.  Custom efficiency measures are designed specifically to a customer’s individual needs.  In order to qualify for funding, APS requires the applicants to provide a feasibility study that estimates annual energy savings.

 

Because these programs are new and lack specific results, the Commissioners approved APS’ application on an interim basis.  Within 13 months of this decision, APS is required to refile the non-residential portion, with 12 months of actual data, for final Commission approval.

 

As with any decision of this magnitude, there are many complexities.  People seeking details about specific programs or how to qualify are encouraged to view the final Commission decision in this case.  It will be posted to the Commission’s e-Docket system at www.azcc.gov as soon as it is signed by all five Commissioners.  The docket number for the case is E-01345A-05-0477.  Building owners and managers with interest in these programs should contact APS’ Customer Information & Programs department directly at 602-250-2303.

###

 

Comments from Commissioners

Chairman Jeff Hatch-Miller:  “It is much cheaper to conserve energy – not use it – than it is to generate it and send it out to citizens.  The ACC works hard to ensure there is enough electricity to meet our ever expanding needs.  Providing the tools for effective conservation is one of the most critical components to providing for Arizona’s energy future.”

Commissioner Marc Spitzer:  “Energy, the supply, cost and reliability of energy, is the most significant issue facing this country.  This is the most ambitious program to reduce the energy burden in Arizona history, and perhaps the best program in the country.  We at the Corporation Commission are proud to do our part.”

Commissioner Bill Mundell:  “In the six years I have been on the Commission, this is one of my most important votes.  This decision will help schools and small businesses save money on their energy bills, while at the same time protecting the environment.”

Commissioner Mike Gleason:  (Cast the dissenting vote)  “The interim nature of this decision is important.  The ability to execute these plans and the societal benefits are questionable.”

Commissioner Kris Mayes:  “The schools program will help Arizona’s school districts.  As energy prices rise, schools will be able to use these energy efficient measures to combat recent increases in their energy bills.  This program has direct, tangible benefits to taxpayers.”

PHOENIX – Renewable energy technologies got a huge boost in an Arizona Corporation Commission vote this week.  In a state known for its sunshine but not known for large, swiftly moving rivers and streams or large scale geothermal opportunities, state regulators set high standards for renewable energy, hoping to capitalize on Arizona’s sunshine and other “green energy” opportunities.  On Monday, Commissioners Marc Spitzer, Bill Mundell and Kris Mayes voted to require regulated electric utilities to generate 15 percent of their energy from renewable resources by 2025. 

For 2006, utilities must generate 1.25 percent of retail energy sold from renewable resources. 

The Commission’s Renewable Energy Standards allow utilities to use solar, wind, biomass, biogas, geothermal and other similar technologies to generate “clean” energy to power Arizona’s future.  The rules package outlines what technologies qualify and allow for new and emerging technologies to be added as they become feasible. 

In addition to utility-owned projects such as Tucson Electric Power’s large solar installation in Springerville, Arizona, the Commissioners also required a growing percentage of the total resource portfolio to come from distributed generation – residential or non-utility owned installations.  The distributed energy requirement starts at 5 percent of the total portfolio in 2007 and grows to 30 percent of the total renewable mix after 2011.

In many cases, distributed generation installations – such as a large solar installation on the roof of a shopping mall, or solar panels at someone’s home – qualify for utility rebates or state and federal tax breaks that offset some of the upfront costs.

Unlike other states that set aggressive standards but “grandfather” or give credit for existing projects, Arizona’s Renewable Energy Standards are focused on adding new generation and taking advantage of emerging opportunities.

If a utility does not meet the standard, it can apply for a waiver and go through a hearing but the Commission may still assess a penalty for non-compliance.

To help offset the increased cost of meeting the more aggressive standard, the current Environmental Portfolio Surcharge amount will change.  Currently, customers pay $0.000875 per kilowatt hour.  The new surcharge amount is $0.004988 per kilowatt hour.  There are monthly caps in place limit the total impact on customer bills.  Currently, residential customers are capped at 35 cents.  The new cap will be $1.05.  Non-residential customers currently have a cap of $13 but that will increase to a maximum charge of $39.00.  For extremely energy-intensive commercial accounts (mines, heavy-manufacturing, etc.) the surcharge is capped at $117, up from $39.

The Renewable Energy Standards were formerly known at the Environmental Portfolio Standard that topped out at 1.1 percent in 2007.  In February 2004, the Commissioners voted to review the rules and consider adopting a more aggressive standard.

 

The Commission convened a series of intensive workshops involving the Commissioners and staff, proponents of various technologies, environmental advocacy groups and the utilities.  The Renewable Energy Standards rules package is the result of this collaborative process.

 

Before taking effect, the rules must go through a review by the Attorney General’s Office and a formal rulemaking process with the Arizona Secretary of State’s office.  It could be late in the third quarter or early in the fourth quarter of 2006 before the regulations are binding.

 

###
 

Comments from the Commissioners

 

Commissioner Marc Spitzer:

“There has been a lot of discussion of the technical issues and economics of renewable energy.  The numbers say that fossil fuels prices are going up, natural gas has tripled in three years and that means the future price of electricity is going up.  Today we’re doing something that transcends numbers.  Sick children hooked up to respirators because we’ve had another bad air day is not something you can quantify.  And the people of this country are frustrated that the nation’s energy future is tied to unstable nations and natural disasters that threaten our energy infrastructure.  We need to change the rules and strike a better balance.  Today we’ve changed the rules.  Tomorrow we may strike that better balance.”

 

Commissioner Bill Mundell:

“In 2001, when we passed the current rules we were the first state to do so.  Arizona was on the cutting edge.  Now we’ve fallen behind.  By passing these rules, we’ve put Arizona back in the forefront of renewable energy.  Not only will we have cleaner air and conserve our water, we will create jobs and economic development in Arizona.  This is a vote for our children and grandchildren.”

 

Commissioner Kris Mayes:

“I proudly vote yes on these rules.  We are taking our energy destiny into our own hands and making an investment in our state’s future.  This is a vote for independence from high utility bills, from bad air and from terrorist sponsoring countries that produce oil.  A recent poll showed that 75 percent of Arizona customers are willing to pay a little more to ensure our energy independence.  This will reduce the need for additional power plants and power lines while allowing us to meet the power needs of the thousands of new people moving into the state each month.”

 

Commissioner Mike Gleason:  Gleason voted against the rules. 

“This is going to get very expensive.  The experts from the utilities say this is going to be very, very difficult to achieve.  Years from now when the costs go through the roof, people will be asking ‘What were they thinking when they passed this?’ ”

 

Chairman Jeff Hatch-Miller was out of the country on previously planned travel.  In a February 16 letter to his colleagues, Chairman Hatch-Miller signaled his opposition to the Renewable Energy Standards.

 

 

Find this case through the E-Docket link at www.azcc.gov

Search for docket number RE-00000C-05-0030

 

Quick Launch...